The first and worst of all frauds is to cheat one’s
self. All sin is easy after that.
~Pearl Bailey
Academic cheating or to use the more formal term, to
commit “plagiarism” is a regular occurrence at the college level whether it is
deliberate or unintentional. Students are tasked with writing papers, conducting
research, and submitting work based on their own skills and ability. Academic
institutions in order to ensure students are submitting their own work have employed
technology in the form of plagiarism detection software. These efforts have deterred much of the
possible cheating but has it really been effective?
There were two studies conducted with students from
California State University who wrote papers that were checked for plagiarism
using plagiarism-detection software. In
one class, half the students were informed of the use of plagiarism software and
the other half were not informed of this method of evaluation (Youmans, 2011) . Why do students commit plagiarism? Analysis
has indicated students lack maturity, underdeveloped sense of integrity, and a
lack of experience with a particular writing genre or a lack of interest in a
particular assignment (Calvert & Moorman, 2012) .
Most public and private schools, colleges, and
universities have academic integrity or honor codes and explain the results of
plagiarism but what are instructors doing to ensure plagiarism does not occur (Calvert & Moorman, 2012) ? Colleges are employing plagiarism software such
as TURNITIN and Essay Verification Engine (EVE), and PlagScan to check students
work and detect for plagiarism. These versions of plagiarism detection software
use multiple sources of data to compare the text of a students work with that
of peer evaluated previously written work.
As a strategy to prevent plagiarism an instructor should
ensure the students are well informed of the policy of plagiarism and that detection
software will be used to detect if a student has used the work of others
without properly providing recognition to the original. As revealed in the study at California State
University, the students who were informed of the use of plagiarism software
had a less likely occurrence of plagiarism as opposed to those who were not
informed. Another strategy is to ensure
students provide their own personal assessment of the material by making this a
requirement in the grading rubric.
Lastly, instructors should create an environment of academic integrity,
push the honor codes of the school and promote a culture of honesty and learning
(Calvert & Moorman, 2012) .
Students should not cheat themselves from the
satisfaction of receiving academic credit for their own work and feel a sense
of pride in the degree they truly earn on their own!
Bibliography
Calvert, L., & Moorman, G. (2012). Rethinking
Plagiarism in the Digital Age. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 35-44.
Youmans, R. (2011). Does the adoption of
plagiarism-detection software in higher education reduce plagiarism. Studies in
Higher Education, 749-761.

